That pile of crap required five eyerolls.
Not the first ones to say stuff like that either. Take, for example, in the earliest days of the GBHQ board we had this:
http://www.ghostbustershq.com/phpBB3/vi ... ?f=8&t=240
Dan Shannon wrote:
http://www.christiananswers.net/spotlig ... sters.html
Man, talk about a bunch of up-tight Jesusfreaks. (No offense, Ron.)
Man, talk about a bunch of up-tight Jesusfreaks. (No offense, Ron.)
And I think my reaction to this article is similar to that one:
Fritz wrote:
These are probably the same people who burn Harry Potter books. At least in Ghostbusters, only the bad guys are using magic...
Oh, wait, that doesn't matter...
So basically the only way Ghostbusters would've been acceptable to them is if all four were celibate monks who waved around their Bibles and crosses to stop the demons. Brother Venkman and Brother Stantz having lustful thoughts would be way out--that would be portraying the clergy as lustful and flawed.
Gosh, that movie would probably be boring as Hell (pardon the phrase
), but Ned Flanders would love it, right? 
Oh, wait, that doesn't matter...
Quote:
"The weapons of our warfare are not carnal" (2 Cor. 10:4) means, in part, that we can't fight the spirit world with a bunch of high-tech gadgetry.
So basically the only way Ghostbusters would've been acceptable to them is if all four were celibate monks who waved around their Bibles and crosses to stop the demons. Brother Venkman and Brother Stantz having lustful thoughts would be way out--that would be portraying the clergy as lustful and flawed.
Gosh, that movie would probably be boring as Hell (pardon the phrase
), but Ned Flanders would love it, right?